One of the greatest Mk gurus

saifulislam16@g

On the other hand, I consider as a client that having my information hanging around somewhere is a very thin line between being beneficial or the opposite. Login to respond Angel Couto Technology has been linked to the development of people since humans made the first knife with a stone. The tools facilitate work and the achievement of objectives, this is beyond any doubt. But the objectives are not the same for everyone. If we pose the dilemma of personal enrichment vs. a better world, surely the objectives and ways of carrying them out contradict each other on many occasions, although not always.


But it is also true that the ultimate decision on how Denmark WhatsApp Number Data companies should carry out their work and contribute their grain of sand to a better world depends on the beliefs and behavior of consumers, of society. That is why I believe that ethics, in addition to a label or a dogma (now I explain myself), must have a deep social significance and greater training. From nursery schools to the most elite training. I say this because talking about ethics is fashionable and great, but there are no debates, no training, no behavioral workshops. At least I don't notice it. Philip Kotler has been talking for some time about the need for companies to contribute to improving the world.





Although he does not talk anything about ethics or how one should participate in the improvement of society, he does say that it is a necessity because the people, the consumers of today and tomorrow, demand it. Profitability vs better world. Is the dilemma valid? I ask this question because many companies will not be able to dedicate any of their income or profits to creating a better world. I think the key may be in learning to make a better world regardless of whether the company can dedicate its income to reforestation projects, for example. Day-to-day decisions and without intervening or harming profitability can make a better world. I can only cite examples.